top of page
Search

Vegan vs. Plant-Based vs. Whole Food: A Deeply Pedantic Investigation

  • Writer: Emanuele Bortolotto
    Emanuele Bortolotto
  • Jul 26
  • 8 min read

Updated: Sep 7


It’s a quiet afternoon here in Helsinki, a time when one might ponder life’s great questions while enjoying a quiet cup of coffee. And as an investigator of modern human tribes, I have been pondering one of the great questions of our time, one that causes a surprising amount of confusion, debate, and low-grade social anxiety: what is the actual difference between "vegan," "plant-based," and "whole-food, plant-based?"

I know what you're thinking. "Aren't they all just... people who are a bit weird about vegetables?" To an outsider, it can seem like a ridiculous exercise in splitting hairs. I've seen it play out in real time: a friend proudly declares they are "plant-based," only to be immediately cross-examined by a "vegan" at the same party about the origins of their shoes. It’s a confusing landscape of shifting definitions and passionate allegiances.

So, I decided to embark on a deeply pedantic investigation. I journeyed into the heart of this terminological jungle to map the terrain, study the local tribes, and create a definitive field guide. What I discovered is that these aren't just interchangeable labels; they are different philosophies, different rulebooks, and different ways of seeing the world. 🗺️


The Investigation Begins: A Taxonomy of Terms


To an outsider, the subtle distinctions between different groups of people who eat a lot of plants might seem insignificant. But as my research has shown me time and time again, what seems like a minor detail to one person can be a matter of profound identity to another.

The difference between "vegan" and "plant-based" is a bit like the difference between subgenres of heavy metal. To my grandmother, it all just sounds like a delightful racket. 🤷‍♀️ But to a true fan, the distinction between "symphonic metal" and "power metal" is a subject of intense, passionate debate. A band like Rhapsody of Fire, with their epic tales of dragons and swords, occupies a very specific niche that is different from, say, a gothic doom metal band. The labels matter because they signify a different philosophy, a different history, and a different set of rules. I have found the same is true for the world of plant-eaters. The difference between "vegan" and "plant-based" is not just semantics; it's a declaration of allegiance.

My investigation concludes that the easiest way to understand these terms is to think of them as answering three different questions:

  • Vegan: Answers the question "Why?"

  • Plant-Based: Answers the question "What?"

  • Whole-Food, Plant-Based (WFPB): Answers the question "How?"

Let’s break down each of these tribes, one by one.


The Vegan: A Deep Dive into the "Why"


The first and most important thing I discovered about the term "vegan" is that it is not, at its core, a diet. It is an ethical philosophy. The diet a vegan eats is simply the most obvious consequence of that philosophy.

The official definition, which I’ve explored in other investigations, comes from The Vegan Society. It defines veganism as a way of living that seeks to exclude, "as far as is possible and practicable," all forms of animal exploitation and cruelty. The keyword here is exploitation. The primary motivation for a true vegan is ethics. They believe that animals are not commodities for humans to use, and this belief informs every aspect of their life, from their food and clothing to their entertainment and cosmetics.

This is why a person who is ethically vegan won't wear a leather jacket, even though they aren't eating it. It's why they'll avoid a circus that uses animal performers. The "why" is a consistent moral stance against animal use in all its forms.

Because the motivation is ethical, not necessarily health-based, the "vegan" food label tells you nothing about how healthy a food is. This has led to the rise of a fascinating and ever-growing archetype: the Junk Food Vegan.


Case Study: The Junk Food Vegan


Let's imagine a day in the life of someone who is a committed ethical vegan but isn't particularly focused on their health.

  • Breakfast: A bowl of sugary, cartoon-mascot cereal with sweetened oat milk. 🥣

  • Lunch: A bag of salt and vinegar crisps and a can of soda.

  • Dinner: A frozen vegan pizza topped with processed plant-based pepperoni and a thick layer of oily, coconut-based cheese, followed by a pint of vegan cookie dough ice cream. 🍦

Is this person a vegan? Yes, absolutely. They have successfully avoided all animal products and have not contributed to the demand for animal exploitation. Are they healthy? Absolutely not. This diet is a festival of refined carbohydrates, sugar, sodium, and unhealthy fats. This is the perfect illustration of the principle: "vegan" answers the question "why," not "how."


The Plant-Based Eater: A Deep Dive into the "What"


The term "plant-based" is a much newer and, I have found, a much more flexible and confusing label. It was popularized in the 2000s, largely by nutrition scientists and doctors who wanted to talk about the health benefits of eating plants without getting tangled up in the ethical and political baggage of the word "vegan."

"Plant-based" is a simple, descriptive term. It answers the question, "What do you eat?" The answer is: "I eat a diet based on plants." It does not, however, automatically answer the question "why." The motivation for a plant-based diet is often health, but it can also be environmental, or simply a matter of taste.

Crucially, "plant-based" exists on a spectrum. It is often used to describe a diet that is entirely plant-based (a diet that is, in practice, vegan), but it is also used by people who are "plant-forward." This is the key difference.


Case Study: The Health-Conscious "Plant-Forward" Eater


Let's imagine a day in the life of someone who identifies as "plant-based."

  • Breakfast: A green smoothie with spinach, banana, and almond milk.

  • Lunch: A huge quinoa salad packed with roasted vegetables and a lemon vinaigrette.

  • Dinner: A large portion of lentil soup. But, perhaps once or twice a month, this person might eat a piece of salmon because they've read about the benefits of omega-3s. Or they might eat a piece of their grandmother's birthday cake, not wanting to make a fuss about the eggs and butter.

Is this person vegan? No. The inclusion of any animal products, no matter how infrequent, means they are not following the vegan philosophy. Are they on a plant-based diet? Yes, absolutely. Their diet is predominantly, almost entirely, based on plants. This person would likely still wear their old leather shoes, seeing no ethical problem with it, because their motivation is health, not animal rights. This is the essence of why you can be plant-based but not vegan.


The WFPB Devotee: A Deep Dive into the "How"


This brings us to our third and most specific tribe: the Whole-Food, Plant-Based (or WFPB) community. If "vegan" is the why and "plant-based" is the what, then "WFPB" is the how. It is a specific, health-focused dietary pattern that has its own, additional set of strict rules.

A WFPB diet starts with a plant-based foundation (no animal products), but then it adds another layer of restrictions on top: it also eliminates or minimizes all processed foods. This includes:

  • No Refined Oils: WFPB purists do not cook with oil. They get their fats from whole sources like avocados, nuts, and seeds.

  • No Refined Sugars: This means no white sugar, high-fructose corn syrup, or even "healthier" syrups like maple or agave. Sweetness comes from whole fruits.

  • No Refined Grains: This means no white flour, white pasta, or white rice. Grains are consumed in their whole, unprocessed form.

The "why" for a WFPB dieter is almost exclusively health. This is the diet promoted by a number of prominent doctors and researchers for its power to prevent and reverse chronic diseases.


Case Study: The WFPB Purist


Let's look at a day in the life of this dedicated individual.

  • Breakfast: A bowl of steel-cut oats, cooked in water, topped with fresh berries and walnuts.

  • Lunch: A massive salad with every color of the rainbow, topped with oil-free baked tofu and an oil-free dressing made from blended spices and lemon juice.

  • Dinner: A baked sweet potato topped with steamed broccoli and black beans.

Is this diet vegan? Yes, in terms of its ingredients, it is 100% vegan. But is it the same as the Junk Food Vegan's diet? Not even close. This is why a WFPB diet is a vegan diet, but not all vegan diets are WFPB.



Questions from the Internet: "So… which one is the healthiest?"


After my deep investigation into the science, the answer to this is quite clear. Of the different dietary patterns, the Whole-Food, Plant-Based (WFPB) diet is the one with the most robust and overwhelming body of scientific evidence supporting its health benefits. By eliminating both animal products and processed junk foods, it delivers the highest concentration of fiber, vitamins, minerals, and phytonutrients, while being naturally low in the saturated fat, sodium, and refined sugars that are linked to chronic disease. While a junk-food vegan diet is still likely better for your cholesterol than a diet of bacon and butter, the WFPB diet is the undisputed champion of long-term health. 🥇


Questions from the Internet: "Can I call myself 'vegan' if I'm just doing it for my health?"


This is a fantastic and deeply controversial question. My investigation revealed that this is a major point of contention. If you go into an online forum and ask this, you are likely to start a digital civil war.

  • The Purist's View: Many ethical vegans would say no. They argue that the word "vegan" is, by definition, an ethical stance. To use the word without subscribing to the underlying philosophy of animal rights is to co-opt and dilute the meaning of their movement. They would prefer you use the term "plant-based."

  • The Pragmatist's View: Other vegans would say, "Who cares? Welcome!" They believe that any person who stops eating animal products is a win for the animals and the planet, regardless of their motivation.

My conclusion as a neutral investigator? The purists have a strong point about the definition of the word. But in practice, the labels are often used interchangeably by the general public. It's a messy, ongoing debate.



The "vegan" label, as we've seen, is tied to a deep and complex ethical philosophy. To get the full, unabridged story on the ideas of speciesism, sentience, and what drives that side of the movement, you have to read my investigation: [What Is Ethical Veganism?]


The Conclusion: A Guide to the Labels


So, after this deeply pedantic but hopefully illuminating investigation, what have we learned?

We’ve learned that these are not just different words for the same thing. They are different concepts, with different motivations, and different rules.

Let me summarize my findings in a simple cheat sheet:

  • Vegan: An ethical philosophy to avoid all animal exploitation. The diet is the result. Can be healthy or unhealthy. This is the WHY.

  • Plant-Based: A broad dietary description for a diet centered on plants. Motivation is often health. Can be flexible. This is the WHAT.

  • Whole-Food, Plant-Based: A specific, health-focused diet that avoids all animal products AND all processed foods like oil and sugar. This is the HOW.


In the end, I’ve found that the human obsession with labels is a powerful force. We use them to define ourselves, to find our tribes, and sometimes, to build walls between ourselves and others. But whatever you call it, the science is clear: a diet that is centered on whole plant foods is a powerful choice for your health. And that’s a truth that needs no label. ✅



Sources


Recent Posts

See All

Comments

© 2020 Copyright Emanuele Bortolotto

bottom of page